Authors Mohammed H. DoshDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Education for Women, University of Kufa, Al-Najaf, Iraq Abstract Fault diagnosis is an important condition for reliable and safe UAV electrical power systems in multiple fault condition, which can be achieved with accurate and timely diagnosis. To overcome this challenge, the authors in this study suggest a dual-stage convolutional neural network (CNN) approach to multi-fault diagnosis in UAV electrical power systems. The proposed architecture combines two complementary classification steps: one based on a fault detection model that classifies normal and abnormal operating conditions, and another based on a fault isolation model that classifies faulty sensors or system components. The framework was built and assessed with the NASA ADAPT dataset, which consists of 122 fault scenarios and 292,169 samples gathered from the operation of UAV electrical power systems. Data preprocessing, hyperparameter optimization, comparative evaluation and confusion matrix analysis were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. Results have shown high Precision, Recall, F1-score, ROC-AUC and Matthew's correlation coefficient with 99.10% and 99.30% classification accuracy for fault detection and fault isolation respectively. Comparative experiments also demonstrated superior performance of the proposed CNN-based approach to SVM, Random Forest, XGBoost, ANN and LSTM models under the considered conditions. Furthermore, the model stability, interpretation and the role of the most important CNN parts in its working were investigated through five-fold cross validation, SHAP-based feature analysis, and an ablation study. The results show that using the proposed dual-stage CNN, multi-fault diagnosis is an effective method and can serve as a foundation for intelligent health monitoring and reliability improvement of electrical power systems in UAVs. Keywords Fault detection and isolation (FDI) Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) Convolutional neural networks (CNN) Multi-fault diagnosis Deep learning models. Citation of this Article Mohammed H. Dosh. (2026). Multi-Fault Diagnosis in UAV Electrical Power Systems Using a Dual-Stage CNN. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Technologies (JAIET). 3(8), 53-67. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.47001/JAIET/2026.308006 Licence Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Technologies. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International Licence. References Adaika Z, Al-Haddad LA, Giernacki W, Jaber AA, Boumehraz M, Hamzah MN, et al. Fault detection and diagnosis methodologies for unmanned aerial vehicles: State-of-the-art. 2025;111(2):63.Lei Y, Yang B, Jiang X, Jia F, Li N, Nandi AKJMs, et al. Applications of machine learning to machine fault diagnosis: A review and roadmap. 2020;138:106587.Li D, Wang Y, Wang J, Wang C, Duan YJS, Physical AA. Recent advances in sensor fault diagnosis: A review. 2020;309:111990.Telford R, Galloway SJIESiT. Fault classification and diagnostic system for unmanned aerial vehicle electrical networks based on hidden Markov models. 2015;5(3):103-11.Hotra O, Kovtun S, Dekusha OJM. Analysis of the characteristics of bimetallic and semiconductor heat flux sensors for in-situ measurements of envelope element thermal resistance. 2021;182:109713.Alasadi SA, Bhaya WSJJoE. Review of data preprocessing techniques in data mining. Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences. 2017;12(16):4102-7.Freddi A, Longhi S, Monteriu A, editors. Actuator fault detection system for a mini-quadrotor. 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics; 2010: IEEE.Sharifi F, Mirzaei M, Gordon BW, Zhang Y, editors. Fault tolerant control of a quadrotor UAV using sliding mode control. 2010 conference on control and Fault-Tolerant Systems (SysTol); 2010: IEEE.Cândido AS, Galvão RKH, Yoneyama T, editors. Actuator fault diagnosis and control of a quadrotor. 2014 12th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN); 2014: IEEE.Iannace G, Ciaburro G, Trematerra AJR. Fault diagnosis for UAV blades using artificial neural network. 2019;8(3):59.Liu W, Chen Z, Zheng M, editors. An audio-based fault diagnosis method for quadrotors using convolutional neural network and transfer learning. 2020 American Control Conference (ACC); 2020: IEEE.Chen L, Zhang Z, Cao JJPO. A novel method of combining generalized frequency response function and convolutional neural network for complex system fault diagnosis. 2020;15(2):e0228324.Mohammed MA. Enhancing IoT Anomaly Detection using Hybrid CNN-LSTM Model and Interpretable Feature Selection. Zanco Journal of Pure Applied Sciences. 2025;37(6):161-81.Sönmezocak T, Yıldız M, editors. Propeller Damage and Screw Loosening Detection in UAV Systems Based on Acoustic Signals: An Empirical Mode Decomposition Approach. 2025 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Computer, Data Sciences and Applications (ACDSA); 2025: IEEE.He Y, Fang H, Yan J, Yang C, Zhai YJMS, Processing S. Computationally efficient uav fault diagnosis with adaptive vibration denoising: A signal processing approach for rotorcraft systems. 2025;240:113413.Puchalski R, Ha Q, Giernacki W, Nguyen HAD, Nguyen LVJJoI, Systems R. PADRE–a repository for research on fault detection and isolation of unmanned aerial vehicle propellers. 2024;110(2):74.Cen Z, Noura H, Al Younes Y, editors. Robust fault estimation on a real quadrotor UAV using optimized adaptive Thau observer. 2013 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS); 2013: IEEE.NASA. ADAPT EPS of UAV dataset. 2020.Noor M, Yahaya A, Ramli NA, Al Bakri AMJKEM. Filling missing data using interpolation methods: Study on the effect of fitting distribution. 2014;594:889-95.Raschka SJPLAR. About feature scaling and normalization and the effect of standardization for machine learning algorithms. 2014;30:67-89.García S, Luengo J, Herrera F. Data preprocessing in data mining: Springer; 2015.Paraskevas K, Christos TJA. Data preprocessing and feature engineering for data mining: Techniques, tools, and best practices. 2025;6(10):257.Potdar K, Pardawala TS, Pai CDJIjoca. A comparative study of categorical variable encoding techniques for neural network classifiers. 2017;175(4):7-9.