Authors Ndudi-Wali Kinikanwo WisdomComputer Science Department, Rivers State University, NigeriaProf. Daniel MatthaisComputer Science Department, Rivers State University, NigeriaDr. Victor T EmmahComputer Science Department, Rivers State University, Nigeria Abstract Automatic fake-news classifiers can learn publisher, recurring topics, and other factors unrelated to factual veracity. In this paper, a context-aware classifier is evaluated under temporal and event grouping for Nigerian political and election-related claims. The global training set included a corpus of 29,269 non-synthetic fact-check claims descriptions and a manually verified supplement of 135 Nigerian fact-check claims collected from 46 fact-check web pages and 75 event groups. Verdicts were classified as REAL if they were unequivocally TRUE, CORRECT, or ACCURATE and classified as FAKE if they were FALSE, INCORRECT, or FAKE. The global backbone used a combination of word and character TF-IDF feature sets with Logistic Regression classifier, calibrated Linear Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and validation-weighted soft voting. A separate context head using a Logistic Regression model was trained from grouped out-of-fold predictions on 101 claims with dates of 2023-2025 and added to the global ensemble as a blend. All 34 claims from 2026 were reserved for final testing. Contextual blend achieved 0.6765 accuracy, 0.6825 balanced accuracy, 0.6762 macro F1-score, and 0.7368 ROC-AUC, and the REAl and FAKE recall of 0.6316 and 0.7333, respectively. The global ensemble achieved 0.6947 balanced accuracy and 0.6964 macro F1-score in the same test. The difference in balanced accuracies was −0.0123, and its 95% event-group bootstrap confidence interval was (−0.1399; 0.0947), with an exact p-value of 1.000. Keywords Fake-news screening; Nigerian political claims; temporal validation; domain shift; ensemble learning Citation of this Article Ndudi-Wali Kinikanwo Wisdom, Prof. Daniel Matthais, & Dr. Victor T Emmah. (2026). Leakage-Aware Fake-News Screening for Nigerian Political Claims: Temporal and Domain Evaluation of a Context-Aware Ensemble. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Technologies (JAIET). 3(9), 57-67. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.47001/JAIET/2026.309007 Licence Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Technologies. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International Licence. References I. Hassan, “Dissemination of disinformation on political and electoral processes in Nigeria: An exploratory study,” Cogent Arts & Humanities, vol. 10, no. 1, Art. no. 2216983, 2023, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2023.2216983.A. A. Ibrahim and B. Ekdale, “Political campaign responses to information disorder: A case study of the 2023 Nigerian presidential elections,” The International Journal of Press/Politics, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 595–615, Jul. 2026, doi: 10.1177/19401612251324985.K. Garba, T. Kolajo, and J. B. Agbogun, “A transformer-based approach to Nigerian Pidgin text generation,” International Journal of Speech Technology, vol. 27, pp. 1027–1037, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10772-024-10136-2.A. A. Ibrahim, H. U. Ali, I. Z. Yakubu, and I. A. Lawal, “Fake news detection in Hausa language using transfer learning method,” International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 2259–2269, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.38124/IJISRT/IJISRT24OCT1050.A. Esan, O. Abodunrin, A. Sobowale, I. Adeyanju, N. Okomba, B. Omodunbi, T. Adebiyi, J. Jooda, T. Abdul-Hameed, and O. Asaolu, “Long-short-term memory model for fake news detection in Nigeria,” Ianna Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 167–180, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://iannajournalofinterdisciplinarystudies.com/index.php/1/article/view/149 M. A. Ogunrinde and Y. B. Yusuf, “A culturally aware NLP approach for fake-news detection in Nigerian online media using BERT,” African Scientific Reports, vol. 5, no. 2, Art. no. 351, 2026, doi: 10.46481/asr.2026.5.2.351.J. Alghamdi, Y. Lin, and S. Luo, “A comparative study of machine learning and deep learning techniques for fake news detection,” Information, vol. 13, no. 12, Art. no. 576, 2022, doi: 10.3390/info13120576.L. Hu, S. Wei, Z. Zhao, and B. Wu, “Deep learning for fake news detection: A comprehensive survey,” AI Open, vol. 3, pp. 133–155, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.aiopen.2022.09.001.H. T. Phan, N.-T. Nguyen, and D. Hwang, “Fake news detection: A survey of graph neural network methods,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 139, Art. no. 110235, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110235.V. S. Pendyala and C. E. Hall, “Explaining misinformation detection using large language models,” Electronics, vol. 13, no. 9, Art. no. 1673, 2024, doi: 10.3390/electronics13091673.V. C. Agbasonu, B. C. Amanze, and A. O. Agbakwuru, “Detecting online fake news using machine learning and topological data analysis,” International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 42–50, 2023, doi: 10.33564/IJEAST.2023.v07i10.006.R. Deng and F. Duzhin, “Topological data analysis helps to improve accuracy of deep learning models for fake news detection trained on very small training sets,” Big Data and Cognitive Computing, vol. 6, no. 3, Art. no. 74, 2022, doi: 10.3390/bdcc6030074.E. Altuncu, C. Başkent, S. Bhattacherjee, S. Li, and D. Roy, “FACTors: A new dataset for studying the fact-checking ecosystem,” in Proceedings of the 48th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR ’25), Padua, Italy, 2025, pp. 3530–3539, doi: 10.1145/3726302.3730339.C. Schröer, F. Kruse, and J. Marx Gómez, “A systematic literature review on applying CRISP-DM process model,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 181, pp. 526–534, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.199.N. Akewushola, F. Abeka, R. Olatunji, and F. Quadri, “2023 election: Fact-checking 12 claims made by Kwankwaso at Chatham House,” FactCheckHub, Feb. 3, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://factcheckhub.com/2023-election-fact-checking-12-claims-made-by-kwankwaso-at-chatham-house/. Accessed: Aug. 21, 2026.N. Akewushola, F. Abeka, R. Olatunji, and F. Quadri, “2023 election: Fact-checking Peter Obi’s claims at Chatham House,” FactCheckHub, Jan. 20, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://factcheckhub.com/2023-election-fact-checking-peter-obis-claims-at-chatham-house/ Accessed: Aug. 26, 2026.N. Akewushola, “Pre-election LIVE-CHECK for Ekiti 2026 governorship election,” FactCheckHub, Jun. 19, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://factcheckhub.com/pre-election-live-check-for-ekiti-2026-governorship-election/ Accessed: Aug. 26, 2026.FactCheckHub Editorial, “LIVE-CHECK: Osun 2026 governorship election,” FactCheckHub, Aug. 15, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://factcheckhub.com/live-check-osun-2026-governorship-election/ Accessed: Aug. 20, 2026.Z. Abdulrasaq and N. Akewushola, “Tinubu’s CNG bus promises: How has he fared?” FactCheckHub, Sep. 21, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://factcheckhub.com/tinubus-cng-bus-promises-how-has-he-fared Accessed: Aug. 12, 2026.K. H. Brodersen, C. S. Ong, K. E. Stephan, and J. M. Buhmann, “The balanced accuracy and its posterior distribution,” in Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Istanbul, Turkey, 2010, pp. 3121–3124, doi: 10.1109/ICPR.2010.764.M. Sokolova and G. Lapalme, “A systematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks,” Information Processing & Management, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 427–437, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2009.03.002.I. Augenstein, C. Lioma, D. Wang, L. Chaves Lima, C. Hansen, C. Hansen, and J. G. Simonsen, “MultiFC: A real-world multi-domain dataset for evidence-based fact checking of claims,” in Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), Hong Kong, China, 2019, pp. 4685–4697, doi: 10.18653/v1/D19-1475.