Authors

Dr. Rasakumar

Department of Computational Science, Nehru Arts and Science College, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract

Efficient irrigation management remains one of the most critical and labor-intensive operations in agriculture and indoor gardening. Watering practices must be carefully regulated irrespective of climatic variability, including high-temperature dry conditions or excessive humidity. Improper irrigation scheduling and inaccurate water quantity control can lead to overwatering, root diseases, nutrient leaching, or water stress, ultimately affecting plant growth and yield. Therefore, precise monitoring of soil moisture levels and environmental parameters is essential to ensure optimal plant health and sustainable water utilization. To address the limitations of manual irrigation—particularly the uncertainty associated with determining the appropriate timing and volume of water application—this study proposes the design and implementation of an Indoor Gardening Irrigation System based on automated sensing and control mechanisms. The system eliminates the need for continuous human supervision by integrating soil moisture sensing, environmental monitoring, and intelligent water delivery control. By automating irrigation decisions, the system enhances plant growth efficiency while significantly reducing water wastage. The proposed architecture employs the ESP8266 NodeMCU microcontroller as the central processing unit due to its integrated Wi-Fi capability and low power consumption. A soil moisture sensor continuously measures the volumetric water content of the growing medium. The microcontroller is programmed with predefined threshold values corresponding to specific plant water requirements. When the detected moisture level falls below the programmed threshold range, the system automatically activates a water pump through a relay-controlled pipeline distribution network. Irrigation continues until the soil moisture level returns to the optimal range, ensuring precision watering based on real-time feedback. In addition to soil monitoring, a DHT11 sensor is incorporated to measure ambient temperature and relative humidity. These environmental parameters provide contextual data that can influence irrigation frequency and evapotranspiration rates. The system also includes a liquid crystal display (LCD) module for real-time local visualization of sensor readings and system status. For remote monitoring and user interaction, the system integrates IoT functionality through the ESP8266’s Wi-Fi interface. Sensor data and irrigation status updates are transmitted to a mobile platform such as Telegram via a cloud-based communication protocol. This enables users to receive real-time notifications, monitor environmental conditions, and supervise irrigation activities remotely. Overall, the developed system provides a smart, energy-efficient, and water-conserving irrigation solution tailored for indoor gardening environments. By combining embedded systems, IoT communication, and sensor-based feedback control, the proposed framework improves irrigation accuracy, enhances plant productivity, and promotes sustainable resource management.

Keywords

Indoor Gardening Smart Irrigation System ESP8266 NodeMCU Soil Moisture Sensor DHT11 Sensor Internet of Things (IoT) Automated Watering System Precision Agriculture Environmental Monitoring Water Conservation

Citation of this Article

Dr. Rasakumar. (2024). An Intelligent Soil Moisture Monitoring and Irrigation System for Indoor Cultivation. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Technologies. 1(2), 7-12. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.47001/JAIET/2024.102002

Licence Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Technologies. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International Licence.

References

  1. Kim, Y., Evans, R. G., & Iversen, W. M. (2008). Remote sensing and control of an irrigation system using a distributed wireless sensor network. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 57(7), 1379–1387.
  2. Gutierrez, J., Villa-Medina, J. F., Nieto-Garibay, A., & Porta-Gandara, M. A. (2014). Automated irrigation system using a wireless sensor network and GPRS module. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 63(1), 166–176.
  3. Jones, H. G. (2004). Irrigation scheduling: Advantages and pitfalls of plant-based methods. Journal of Experimental Botany, 55(407), 2427–2436.
  4. Ojha, T., Misra, S., & Raghuwanshi, N. S. (2015). Wireless sensor networks for agriculture: The state-of-the-art in practice and future challenges. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 118, 66–84.
  5. Raut, R. D., Varma, M., & Siddiquee, A. N. (2018). IoT-based smart irrigation system for water conservation. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4), 45–50.
  6. Bankar, N., Gajbhiye, A., Mahalle, P., & Datarkar, S. (2016). IoT based smart irrigation system. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 6(6), 533–537.
  7. Management Considerations for Irrigated Cotton, Hake, K., D. Krieg, J. Landivar, and D. Oosterhuis. 1992. Plant water relations. Cotton PhysiologyToday3(7).
  8. Wrona, A.F., and D.R. Krieg. 2000. Factors affecting water use. Cotton Physiology Today 11(1). National Cotton Council.
  9. Boman, B. S. Smith and B. Tullos. 2002. Control and Automation in Citrus Microirrigation Systems. Circular 1413, Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida.
  10. Camp, C.R., W.M. Thomas, and C.C. Green. 1993. Microirrigation scheduling and tube placement for cotton in the southeastern coastal plain. Trans. ASAE 36(4):1073-1078.
  11. Camp, C.R., E.J. Sadler, and W.J. Busscher. 1989. Subsurface and alternate-middle microirrigation for the southeastern coastal plain. Trans. ASAE 31(2):451-456.
  12. Khalilian, A., M. J. Sullivan, W. B. Smith. 2000. Optimum lateral depth for subsurface drip irrigation in coastal plain soils. Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Irrigation Symposium. ASAE.
  13. Pitts, D.J., D.Z. Haman and A.G. Smajstrla. 1990. Causes and Prevention of Emitter Plugging in Microirrigation Systems. Bulletin 258, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida
  14. Kim, Y., Evans, R. G., & Iversen , W. M. (2008). Remote sensing and control of an irrigation system using a distributed wireless sensor network. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 57(7), 1379–1387.